While this is primarily a psychological work (as the title states), it touches on a variety of other significant topics, any of which would be worthy of works on their own-- the spirit of adventure and resilience shown by Westerners living in China before the Revolution, the failed political ideology of Communism, and the absolute horrors of political imprisonment and torture. But the part of this book of most interest here is the discussion of thought reform or "brainwashing."
Chinese Thought Reform or "Brainwashing"
Lifton tells us that the term "brainwashing" was first used by an American
Journalist, Edward Hunter, as a translation of the Chinese colloquialism
hsi
nao, which literally means "wash brain." This was the term used by
Chinese informants, apparently in the early 1950's, as knowledge about
prison life after the Chinese Communist revolution became apparent.
The term needs to be understood before we can understand the rest of the items we shall discuss. Lifton himself denounces "promiscuous" uses of the term in advertising, education, training and the like. He also cautions against the notion of "an all-powerful, irresistible, unfathomable and magical method of achieving total control over the human mind;" in his analysis such a method does not exist. Lifton offers this brief statement and a list of questions he sought to address with his research as the place to start in understanding this concept:
Whatever its setting, thought reform consists of two basic elements: confession, the exposure and renunciation or past and present "evil"; and re-education, the remaking of a man in the Communist image. These elements are closely related and overlapping, since they both bring into play a series of pressures and appeals-- intellectual, emotional, and physical-- aimed as social control and individual change. ...Thus, "brainwashing" or "thought reform" is the notion of making someone change his beliefs, especially against his will and without his consent. He distinguishes between education and other forms of consensual influence, yet recognizes the possibility of a blurry line of distinction between some education processes and Chinese thought reform.
Still the vital questions continue to be asked: Can a man be made to change his beliefs? If a change does occur, how long will it last? How do Chinese Communists obtain these strange confessions? Do people believe their own confessions, even when false? How successful is thought reform? Do Westerners and Chinese react differently to it? Is there any defense against it? Is it related to psychotherapy? to religious conversion? Have the Chinese discovered new and obscure techniques? What has all this to do with Soviet Russia and international Communism? with Chinese culture? How is it related to other mass movements or inquisitions, religious or political? What are the implications for education? For psychiatric and psychoanalytic training and practice? For religion? How can we recognize parallels to thought reform within our own culture, and what can we do about them? (pp. 5-6)
Thought Reform with Western Subjects
Lifton presents case histories of Westerners consisting of the following
distinct phases:
Thought Reform with Native Chinese Subjects
In the cases of the native Chinese that Lifton
discusses, similarities and differences in the thought reform process are
seen in comparison to Westerners. Lifton identifies the following general
phases of thought reform for native Chinese at the revolutionary university:
(p. 246)
The goals of thought reform for native Chinese appear to be:
The Long-Term Impact of Thought Reform
Interestingly, of the twenty-five Western subjects of Lifton's research,
only one was regarded as a "true convert."
What can be said about the long-range success or failure of prison thought reform as applied to Westerners? From the standpoint of winning them over to a Communist view of the world, the program must certainly be judged a failure. Only one (Fr. Simon) among my twenty-five subjects (and only one or possibly two more from among the scores of others I heard about) could be regarded as a truly successful convert....Regarding the success of the thought reform program upon native Chinese, Lifton makes the following assessments:
Whatever success thought reform had with most of the Westerners lay in the unconscious influences which they retained from it....
Western subjects consistently reported a sense of having been benefited and emotionally strengthened, of having become more sensitive to their own and others' inner feelings, and more flexible and confident in human relationships. (p. 236-238, emphasis added)
I was led to the conclusion that thought reform, at least during its early phase, had been much more successful with Chinese than with Westerners-- largely because of the immense appeal of nationalism, the reinforcement of thought reform by the Chinese Communist government, the sense of belonging to a group within one's own society, as well as many of the other historical and cultural influences already mentioned. (p. 400)The success of thought reform upon native Chinese had more to do with the lack of options and the exploitation of nationalism than the thought reform techniques themselves.I am aware that I have presented versions of thought reform's limitations and accomplishments, which seem almost contradictory. I have done this intentionally, because these opposing effects can and do co-exist, sometimes even within the same person. A true picture of the program's impact can only be obtained by visualizing within the emotional life of individual Chinese intellectuals a fluctuating complex of genuine enthusiasm, neutral compliance, passive withdrawal, and hostility of suffocation-- along with a tendency to accept much that is unpleasant because it seems to be a necessary part of the greater program, or the only way to get things done. (p. 414)
In conclusion, we may observe that there are some long-term effects of the thought reform process. But true and permanent ideological conversion is not one of those effects. Despite all of the attention and mystery around forced "brainwashing" and thought reform, Lifton proves that it really doesn't work at creating long-term ideological conversion.
Copyright © 2000 John Engler. All rights reserved.
| Previous | Next |